Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 March 2014

Microsoft creates a TitanFall version of Xbox One but you Can't buy it.

titanfallxboxone.0.jpg

Microsoft is clearly excited about the upcoming release of Titanfall on March 11th, so much so that the company has created exclusive consoles for the game’s creators. Employees at Respawn Entertainment, the game development studio behind Titanfall, have tweeted pictures of the exclusive consoles provided by Microsoft. While Microsoft is selling a limited edition Titanfall Xbox One controller, the console itself is not for sale.

Titanfallxb1leaksmall

It looks identical to a leaked image posted January, suggesting Microsoft had considered selling this particular console as part of a bundle package. Instead, Microsoft is bundling the highly anticipated game with a special package next week for the same $499.99 price tag. The Titanfall Xbox One console joins an equally rare white Xbox One version that is not currently on sale. Microsoft is expected to release its white model later this year.


So does the TitanFall Xbox One look good? Do you want it? Leave us your thought below.

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

Windows 8.1 Update 1 coming next month with New and Improved Features

Microsoft has completed the development process of Windows 8.1 Update 1. Sources familiar with Microsoft’s plans have revealed to The Verge that the software maker recently signed off on a final version of the update, a process known internally as Release to Manufacturing (RTM). Microsoft has started sharing Windows 8.1 Update 1 with partners and PC makers ahead of its release next month. Russian leaker WZor claims the final update was originally compiled on February 21st.

While the update is ready, it’s not clear exactly how Microsoft intends to brand the final version. The company announced update 1 as a Spring release during a press event at Mobile World Congress last week. Most of the changes in the update are designed to appease keyboard and mouse users, with options to show Windows 8 apps on the desktop taskbar, the ability to see show the desktop taskbar above Windows 8-style apps, and a new title bar at the top of Windows 8 apps with options to minimize, close, or snap apps. Microsoft is also adding a sgutdown button to the start screen for non-touch machines, with a new search button present across all machines.

Alongside some context menu changes, where right-clicking on Live Tiles now produces a menu with options to resize, unpin, and morel.

Microsoft is planning to automatically boot Windows 8.1 non-touch PC users to the desktop interface by default, as long as they haven’t already changed the existing setting that allows you to bypass the tiled Start Screen. Early test builds also altered the default apps associated with audio files and photos, allowing desktop apps to open the files if boot-to-desktop is automatically enabled. It’s not yet clear if that change has made its way into the final version of Windows 8.1 Update 1.

Microsoft is also tweaking the amount of disk space that Windows 8.1 utilizes. Alongside new license charging, Windows 8.1 Update 1 will allow PC makers to produce machines with just 1GB of RAM and 16GB of storage, a change that will help bring lower price points. Combining all these changes together, it’s clear that Microsoft is adjusting to feedback and willing to invest in the Windows 8.1 desktop. Microsoft will now release Windows 8.1 Update 1 to existing machines on April 8th, following the company’s Build developer conference in early April.

Monday, 3 March 2014

Introducing Cortana, Microsoft's answer to Siri

Microsoft’s upcoming Windows Phone 8.1 update will include Cortana, a personal digital assistant designed to rival Siri and Google Now. Sources familiar with Microsoft’s plans have revealed to The Verge how Cortana Looks and Operates replacing the built-in Bing search functionality on Windows Phone 8.1. While the feature is named after the Halogame series, Cortana will take the form of a circular animated icon instead of a female character. Cortana will animate when it’s speaking or thinking, forming a personality not dissimilar to Apple’s Siri.

NICKNAMES JUST LIKE SIRI

Just like Siri, Cortana will also allow Windows Phone users to set how they want to be addressed by the voice-activated assistant. Cortana can call users by their name or nicknames like "Master Chief" after the function is enabled in the settings. A key part of Cortana is its ability to save information and data in a Notebook system. Notebook will allow the Cortana digital assistant to access information such as location data, behaviors, personal information, reminders, and contact information. Cortana can also track flights or other mentions in emails, allowing it to generate notifications similar to Google Now.

Cortanasettings1_560

Cortana will be backed by data from services like Bing, Foursquare, and others to give it some of the contextual power of Google Now. The voice-activated assistant will also learn more about users and offer to store this personal data in its Notebook. While Microsoft is using the Cortana name during its testing of Windows Phone 8.1, it’s not immediately clear whether the company will opt to use this particular moniker in the final version of the software. Microsoft is expected to unveil Cortana at its upcoming Build conference, and the company will also release a developer preview of Windows Phone 8.1 at the same time.

Any thoughts? Is Siri better or Cortana? Leave your answer in the comments section and we will make sure to follow it up.

Friday, 28 February 2014

Microsoft experimenting on a free version of Windows 8.1; Will you be getting it?

Microsoft is currently experimenting with a free version of Windows 8.1 that could boost the number of people using the operating system. Sources familiar with Microsoft’s plans tell The Verge and Engadget that the company is building "Windows 8.1 with Bing," a version that will bundle key Microsoft apps and services. While early versions of the software have leaked online, we understand that Windows 8.1 with Bing is an experimental project that aims to bring a low-cost version of Windows to consumers. ZDNet first reported some Windows 8.1 with Bing details earlier this week.

DESIGNED AS A FREE OR LOW-COST UPGRADE FOR WINDOWS 7 USERS. WE WANT EVERYONE TO HAVE WINDOWS 8

We’re told that Microsoft is aiming to position Windows 8.1 with Bing as a free or low-cost upgrade for Windows 7 users. Any upgrade offers will be focused on boosting the number of people using Windows 8.1. This Bing-powered version of Windows 8.1 may also be offered to PC makers as part of its recent price cut of $25. It’s not clear how committed Microsoft is to these plans, but the experiment is part of a number of initiatives designed to push and monetize Microsoft’s cloud services and apps. Microsoft is increasingly commited to making Bing as a plattform it can monetize in the future. 


Bing-powered apps are currently bundled into Windows 8.1, and a leaked version of "Windows 8.1 with Bing" does not appear to reveal any significant changes yet. Microsoft recently updated us with its Windows 8.1 Spring Update, and the company is expected to further detail the update at its Build developer conference in April. Additional details around the merging of Windows RT and Windows Phone are also expected to be shared at the Build conference.

By doing this, Microsoft hopes to migrate its users from its widely popular but now discontinued "Windows XP" and its second popular Windows 7 to its recent flagship "Windows 8" and now it's biggest update "Windows 8.1".

So will you be ready and willing to get the free Windows 8.1 FREE UPDATE? Tell us in the comments section down below.

For iTechnoBlog, this is Preet Patel, Sigining Out!

Monday, 24 February 2014

This is the Nokia X : Where Android and Windows combine

Gallery Photo: Nokia X and XL hands-on photos

It’s official: the Nokia X Android phone is here. Microsoft might be buying Nokia’s phone business shortly, but the Finnish smartphone maker is still pushing ahead with the launch of three Android-powered handsets today. Details were revealed about Nokia's Plans in December, and the company is now ready to talk specifics about the X, the X+, and the XL. As expected, all three combine Lumia-style design with low-cost hardware aimed at the masses, from a large 5-inch screen on the 109-Euro XL to the 4-inch display on the 99-Euro X+. The X will be released for just €89 in Eastern Europe, Asia, South America, and a few other global locations, but it won’t be making its way to North America, Japan, Korea, or Western European countries. These aren't competitors to Samsung’s Galaxy S4 or Apple’s iPhone 5S, and there are certainly no surprising hardware additions like a 41-megapixel camera or a giant 6-inch display. Instead, the standout feature of the Nokia X lineup is the software that powers it: Android.

Nokia may have pledged allegiance to Microsoft’s Windows Phone software, but that hasn’t stopped the company from experimenting with Android. The X introduces a new “forked” version of Android that’s akin to what Amazon does with its Kindle Fire line. Nokia is effectively taking the open-source elements of Android and then bolting on its own services, a Windows Phone-like UI, and yet another Android app store. The downside to this is that the Nokia X devices won’t have access to Google’s Play store or Google-specific apps like Gmail, Chrome, Maps, and others. However, Android apps will run on the devices with only limited changes required by developers. Nokia is creating its own store where it will curate “hundreds of thousands” of apps. Third-party stores will also be integrated into the Nokia Store, providing other sources for Android apps. The Nokia X will also support sideloading, just as Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablets do.

Nokia X family hands-on
LG G Pro 2 hands-on at MWC 2014
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro review
Appliances at CES 2014
Nerf Cam Blaster hands-on
Interview with Netflix chief product officer Neil Hunt
90 Seconds on The Verge: Friday, January 10th, 2014
How Bob Diamond rediscovered the world's oldest subway tunnel
Titanfall for Xbox One preview
Testing Audi's self-driving and traffic light-monitoring cars
Tegra K1 prototype hands-on
Urb-E electric scooter hands-on
Parrot Mini Drone and Sumo hands-on
Tesla Model S
How Netflix won CES
Nexus 5 review
Driving the Toyota i-Road concept car
Apple iPad Air review
Farewell CES 2014: a look back at an insane week in tech
Facebook Paper If you put the Nokia X side-by-side with the company’s Lumia 520 handset it might be hard to tell them apart. The same striking colors and design are available on both, and they each use the same 4-inch display. Nokia isn’t going for the high-end with the X at all, and the company has clearly trimmed its hardware specifications as much as possible to ensure the phone is low-cost but still usable. There are just 4GB of storage with 512MB of RAM, but microSD cards will be supported to help boost the tiny amount of storage available. The Nokia X+, identical in appearance to the X, also boosts both the storage and memory. Apart from the internal storage and dual-SIM support, the Nokia X only really differs from the Lumia 520 on the outside, with a lack of Windows Phone’s three capacitive buttons and a slight camera changNokia's XL takes a slightly different approach, with a 5-inch display and a combination of a 5-megapixel rear camera and 2-megapixel front-facing one. Nokia is positioning the XL as "great for Skype, while the X and X+ both ship with just a 3-megapixel fixed focus camera. All three have just a single capacitive button for navigation. You hit the button once to go back and hold it down to return to the home screen. Software customizations on the home screen and across the OS are where the X line gets interesting, or, perhaps, confusing. Nokia has created a Windows Phone-like tiled home screen that looks like a blatant rip of Microsoft’s own UI. All installed apps will be displayed here instead of a separate app drawer, and you can even alter the tile sizes to be medium or large. Th.

Swiping across reveals the Fastlane feature, an option that makes its way over from Nokia’s line of Asha handsets. Fastlane is a mixture of notifications and recent activity combined into a stream. Favorite contacts, recent pictures, and any app notifications will all be listed in a single UI, with options to pull down and peer into future calendar appointments.

Nokia_x_green_1020

Nokia has been working on the X for a long time

Using the X software can be quite frustrating, however, as the entire interface is prone to slow response and a lot of lag. Closing or switching between apps on the X takes far longer than other, even entry-level, smartphones, and browsing the web will quickly test your patience. The third-party apps we saw on the X, such as Facebook, looked as they do on other Android smartphones, but they too suffered from poor performance. Nokia’s choice to combine the functions of home and back into the single back button is confusing, and it’s difficult to predict exactly where in the interface the button will take you when you press it.

Part of the reason for the laggy interface and apps could be related to the low specifications of the X family, but it’s more likely related to the Android version in use on these devices. Windows Phone runs well on the almost identical Lumia 520 hardware, but Nokia has opted for Android 4.1.2 on the X series. This particular Jelly Bean version of Android was released back in October 2012 and doesn’t include the more recent Android 4.4 kitkat. KitKat uses 16 percent less memory than Jelly Bean, so things like task switching and app resuming would likely be improved if Nokia had opted to fork the latest Android version. The use of such an old version of Android indicates just how long Nokia has been working on the X, though.

Nokia_x_red_1020

The real question around the X family is simple: why? Nokia says its X Android phone is just the first of many, a whole line of X phones that are designed to combine the flexibility of Android apps and services from Microsoft and Nokia. Additional members of the X line are supposed to be coming this year, assuming Microsoft doesn’t kill the project once the company fully acquires Nokia in the coming weeks. Some of the answers for why such devices are coming to market at this stage are clearly present in the apps that Nokia is bundling with the X. MixRadio, Here Maps, OneDrive, Outlook, and Skype will all be preinstalled, and Bing is the default search engine on the X. While it might seem obvious that Microsoft wouldn’t want its closest mobile partner to go Android, Nokia appears to be positioning the X as a method to draw people to Microsoft’s cloud services. The bundling of key apps instead of the usual Google equivalents is a clear method to push the masses towards Microsoft’s ecosystem.

Microsoft will control the future of Nokia X

Nokia’s announcement comes less than a day after Microsoft unveiled hardware improvements on its Windows phone 8.1 that are specifically designed for low-cost devices like the X. Microsoft is chasing after Android and it will soon have its own flavor to either push ahead with or kill. The Nokia X just feels like an experimental project created by a team of determined engineers who wanted to see this phone on shelves. It has all the hallmarks of Nokia’s approach with the N9: a phone that felt like it was released merely because of the amount of effort that went into developing it. It’s going to face the same problems Amazon experiences with out-of-date Android apps in its own store, and the delay between new apps arriving and filtering down to these non-Google stores. For Microsoft, who will acquire Nokia’s phone business in a matter of weeks, the use of Android is questionable.

At a press event yesterday, Joe Belfiore — who runs a team focused on PCs, phones, and tablets at Microsoft — said the software maker has a "terrific" relationship with Nokia when questioned about the X announcement. "What they do as a company is what they do," said Belfiore. "Certainly they'll do some things that we're excited about, and some things that we may be less excited about." Microsoft’s reaction in the coming weeks and months will reveal exactly how excited the company is about Nokia’s X project, but until then these Android phones are still a puzzling result of what Nokia has always done best: experiment.


Nokia_x_hero_1020

Excited for the Samsung Galaxy S5 Event? We are as well! So stay tuned to itechnoblog for our Liveblog and our Live Posting.

(Via : Theverge.com)

Saturday, 22 February 2014

Microsoft is cutting down Pricing of Windows to compete with ChromeOS and MacOSX

If you've ever owned a pc, you might know how expensive the OS is. This is because the distributors like Dell and HP need to pay $50 to Microsoft to use Windows on their PC's. This has lead the PC builders to explore other ways such as GoogleOs or even most recently Android. 
But the crew in Redmond may have found a way to narrow the price gap, though. Bloomberg claims that Microsoft is cutting Windows 8.1's license fee to $15 for any device that sells for less than $250, letting builders offer very cheap Windows PCs without destroying their profits. The developer isn't commenting on the reported discount, but this would be a familiar strategy. There's no guarantee that the company will repeat its earlier success if the lower Windows 8.1 prices take effect. However, it is now a hard time for Microsoft to sell its operating system as other OS such as MacOSX, Ununtu and many more.
Let us know how you feel about this and do you use windows? Leave a comment down below

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

Nokia Lumia Icon Review


Nokia Lumia Icon 2040px
Even Nokia’s boots were innovative.
The company once known as Finnish Rubber Works made well-loved rubber boots long before it made smartphones. And as it shifted from rain-proof soles to cellphone modems in the latter half of the 20th century, Nokia became as innovative and important a technology company as any. In 1982, it made the first truly connected phone, the Mobira Senator; its Nokia 1100 later became the best-selling consumer electronics product on the planet. Nokia thought about mobile gaming long before anyone else, and worked with Spike Lee to make movies for phones well before Netflix had an app. No other company has moved the ball forward as many times as Nokia in the last two decades.
In the last two years, Nokia’s bet over and over on its vision for the next new things: design and photography. As the technology becomes commonplace, it’s beauty and design that will separate one phone from another. And with Instagram and Snapchat dominating our collective consciousness, taking great pictures is maybe the most important thing a phone can do. That’s what Nokia’s many Lumia models have all been about, in one way or another.
The Lumia Icon represents Nokia’s shared effort with Verizon to bring that ethos to America's largest cellphone carrier. This isn’t the Lumia 929, though. Its name says everything about its intent, one Nokia doesn’t shy away from: this $199 phone is supposed to be big. Microsoft and Nokia are planning huge marketing, plus a push for both the Icon and Windows Phone 8 in Verizon stores everywhere. For Nokia, for Windows Phone 8, for Microsoft, the stakes couldn’t be higher: all three desperately need the Icon to be iconic.
But what’s in a name, really?
Nokia’s always done its best work when it ignores convention (and occasionally practicality) in favor of hyperbolic superlative. The Lumia 1020 is big and odd-looking in a market filled with paper-thin phones, but its 41-megapixel camera is so superior in its capability that for a certain kind of user, there’s no competition. Though subsequent devices such as the Lumia 1520 and now the Icon haven’t had the same camera hump or massive megapixel count, the capabilities introduced on the 1020 have made their way to other phones with more conventional designs. Before that, there was the Nokia N9— a blocky phone that made no sense for most buyers but was so incredibly beautiful it couldn’t be ignored. When Nokia swings, and swings hard, exciting things happen.
THERE'S A GORGEOUS PHONE IN HERE SOMEWHERE
The Lumia Icon feels like nothing so much as a halfhearted attempt, a bunt. It’s Nokia caught between two worlds: on one side, the classic spec-based definition of a flagship phone; on the other, Nokia’s ideas for what a beautiful phone looks like. The Icon is made of Nokia’s comfortable matte polycarbonate (in black or white) and a sleek, single-piece aluminum side that makes the phone feel incredibly high-end — it's a near-exact mix ofthe Lumia 925's metallic aesthetic and the 928's nice-but-drab design. It’s sharply rectangular, with slightly rounded edges that never felt quite right in my hands and slightly mushy buttons that flex underneath my fingers. But there’s a clear level of fit and finish here that befits a flagship Lumia device.
Flagship phones demand flagship specs, however, and filling out the Verizon store placard forced Nokia to stifle what could have been a really remarkable design. A thinner version of this phone (see: Lumia 925) would have felt like a machine: a beautiful, futuristic, dangerous weapon of a phone. But in order to fit a hefty 2,420mAh battery inside next to the 2.2GHz Snapdragon 800 processor and 2GB of RAM, Nokia turned a svelte design into a thick, bulging brick. It's 5.86 ounces and 9.9 millimeters thick, and feels a lot like a stretched iPhone 4S — not huge or unwieldy by any means, but far from impressive. There are no beautiful colors here, no feats of engineering. Next to a phone like the HTC One or the iPhone 5S, the Icon feels pedestrian.
The flip side, of course, is that the phone works remarkably well. It lasts a full day with normal use: watching movies on the bright display can hurt longevity (two hours and fifteen minutes of Flight over LTE ate 45 percent of the battery), but most days it lasted until bedtime.
Windows Phone 8 handsets have long proven they don't need high-end specs to run smoothly, but the bleeding-edge silicon certainly adds something. Call quality is utterly mediocre, as it was on the Lumia 928, but everything else works well. The operating system flows smoothly underneath my fingers, apps open and resume quicker than ever. The fast processor masks the multitasking woes that still plague the OS — it's not really multitasking, just trying to switch as fast as possible — and makes the Icon feel more coherent an experience than almost any other Windows Phone.
EVERY WINDOWS PHONE DEVICE SHOULD HAVE A SCREEN LIKE THIS
For its part, Windows Phone 8 has come a long way, and the 8.1 update coming soon should improve it even further. Microsoft's ecosystem of apps is impressive, and SkyDrive and Office Mobile solve a lot of problems. More and more of the apps I use every day are available in some form, too, from Instagram and Twitter to Evernote and a half-decent Flappy Bird clone, but the third-party ecosystem still severely lacks Android and iOS. The indie games, the hyper-visual task lists, the many media options available for other platforms simply aren't here, and while Microsoft and its developers often have alternatives, I don't want to be forced into using the best available option. Microsoft has substantially lowered the app gap, but there's still much work left to do.
At least it's beautiful, thanks to a wonderful 5-inch Gorilla Glass 3 display that's as good as any smartphone screen I've used. Its 1080p resolution is high enough to make any video or webpage look good (Update: including Twitter, which originally didn't download for unrelated reasons), and it's bright and vibrant enough to work in almost any situation. It's an OLED panel, which means it oversaturates just about everything, but it jibes perfectly with the Windows Phone 8 interface. (Oddly, Nokia's awesome Glance lockscreen notification feature is missing, which doesn't make sense.) The phone's glass curves slightly on the sides, so my finger slides smoothly toward the edge. This is where flagship specs are an unquestioned advantage: whether watching Netflix or reading in Poki, I just like looking at the Lumia Icon.
Still, I can't get past the idea that somewhere between Nokia's initial sketches and the finished product, the icon in the Icon was lost to compromise. The ugly Verizon logos, the too-thick back, the odd bands across the shell for the wireless radio, the weirdly accessible SIM card slot: this isn't Nokia doing what it does best, what it's proven it can do for decades. This is Nokia making exactly the phone Verizon asked for, a probably sellable but ultimately uninspiring phone that's an icon in name only.
Nokia's camera pedigree is every bit as impressive as its design chops, but its real powers are only available to those willing to invest the time to wield them. The Icon has a 20-megapixel rear camera, the same as the Lumia 1520, and it differs from the spectacular Lumia 1020 only in megapixel count. (And in sheer size, I suppose.) With a huge-for-smartphones 1/2.5-inch sensor and an f/2.4 lens, the Icon often takes beautiful photos, particularly in low light, and its optical image stabilization lets the Icon take stable shots most other phones just can't. The Icon's photos aren't quite as sharp as those I got from the iPhone 5S or Sony's Xperia Z1, and they can be slightly desaturated and muted, but they're far brighter in most cases. It's a better version of a similar compromise with the HTC One: you can get every shot, but not every shot looks perfect.
Nokia's Nokia Camera app is a great addition, letting you re-crop and re-frame photos at will; having 20-megapixel shots just lets you do more with them as you process. Everything you shoot is ultimately exported as a 5-megapixel image, either oversampled to make the photo sharper or framed exactly the way you want. There's also Nokia Creative Studio, a great image-editing app, and Nokia Storyteller Beta for automatically making albums out of your trips and events. Nokia's always developed software to make its products stand out, and nowhere is that more appreciated than with the camera.
LUMIA CAMERAS AREN'T PERFECT, BUT THEY'RE IMPRESSIVE
The 41-megapixel Lumia 1020 lets you do much more with your photos, however, and both require a level of willingness and know-how that's far more complicated than the "Take Picture, Instagram, Repeat" cadence most people know and love. The Icon's autofocus is a bit slow, especially on close-up shots, and it has a dual-LED flash instead of the more natural-looking Xenon flash on the 1020. The camera is good, very good even: I'm happy with most things I shot on the camera. But it's not a new standard, or even a clear improvement over the iPhone 5S. It's just... good. And good is the enemy of iconic.

Wrap-Up

I EXPECTED MORE FROM A PHONE CALLED ICON
Verizon has a long history of dictating design and functionality for its cellphones, and the Nokia Lumia Icon bears those same marks. There are good ideas everywhere — the single-piece aluminum, the 5-inch 1080p display, the 20-megapixel camera — but the finished product feels boardroom-approved at the expense of anything truly interesting. Nokia's capable of much more, and I expected much more from a phone called Icon.
Ultimately, this phone appeals to one customer: the Verizon subscriber who really wants a Windows Phone device. There are certainly those people, but I can't imagine anyone walking into a store looking for an iPhone or Galaxy S4 and leaving instead with a Lumia Icon. That's what this phone was supposed to do: showcase the true power and possibility of Windows Phone 8 by wrapping it in such an irresistible package that buyers wouldn't be able to look away. It doesn't quite get there.
The first Walkman. The original Game Boy. The clickable, spinning iPod. The Polaroid camera.Those are icons, gadgets I can close my eyes and imagine perfectly even now. The Lumia Icon doesn't qualify. It's not bad, far from it. It's just utterly forgettable. And for Nokia, for Windows Phone, for Microsoft, forgettable is dangerous.

GOOD STUFF

  • Gorgeous display
  • Fantastic performance
  • High-res photos are awesomely malleable

BAD STUFF

  • Bland, compromised design
  • Still some ecosystem problems
  • Middling camera performance in places


Friday, 14 February 2014

PlayStation 4 dominates Xbox One in January with nearly double the US sales


The PlayStation 4 outsold the Xbox One in the US last month, according to retail sales data tracked by NPD. Sony says that the PS4 was the top-selling console for January and remains in first place worldwide, but hasn't released the actual number of moved units.
Journalist Geoff Keighley, who spoke to PlayStation SVP Guy Longworth, earlier reported that Sony sold nearly twice as many PS4 consoles as its "nearest next-gen competitor" — assumed to be the Xbox One — and PlayStation marketing VP John Koller confirmed the reports to the official PlayStation blog. "Since we launched on November 15th, we’ve sold every PS4 available in the US," he said.

Microsoft isn't revealing its hardware numbers for the month, either, instead choosing to focus on its software performance. With 2.7 million games, the company captured 47 percent of market share at retail in the US — though it wouldn't divulge the breakdown between Xbox One and Xbox 360 titles. Keighley notes that Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition sold twice as many copies on PlayStation 4, according to Sony. NPD software data is less reliable than hardware, however, as it doesn't include digital sales.
BOTH COMPANIES CAN EXPECT SALES BUMPS
January is a notable point of comparison because it marks the first non-holiday shopping month where both the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 were on sale for the same amount of time. Last month the Xbox One took top spot with an impressive 908,000 systems sold in the US. Given that the PS4 has suffered issues with supply constraint while the Xbox One is now easy enough to find at retail, it seems the $100 price difference between the two is starting to have an effect.
Both manufacturers can expect sales bumps in the coming months — next week sees thePlayStation 4's release in Sony's home market of Japan, and the hotly anticipated Titanfall comes to Xbox One on March 11th.

Thursday, 13 February 2014

Google brings Windows Apps to ChromeOS in latest Microsoft Attack

Acer C720 Chromebook 1024px

Google’s intentions with its Chromebooks have always been clear: disrupt Microsoft’s Windows monopoly. The approach of low-cost devices and a modern cloud-powered OS has left Microsoft a little nervous, but Google is now launching the next stage of its continued attack: the enterprise. In a deal announced quietly this week, Google is partnering with VMWare to bring traditional Windows apps to its Chromebooks. The apps will appear in Chrome OS "similarly to how they run today" according to Google, and VMWare’s cloud-based infrastructure will help companies run their essential apps on servers and stream them to Chrome OS and other devices. The announcement comes just days after Google announced a Chrome-powered teleconferencing system for the enterprise.

GOOGLE'S TIMING IS EVERYTHING

Google's Windows app solution isn’t perfect, and many businesses will prefer native apps running on a Windows machine due to performance, security, and other concerns, but the company's timing is everything. Microsoft is dropping support for Windows XP in April, an operating system that is in widespread use across many organizations worldwide. While many big businesses are paying Microsoft extra money for XP support extensions, it’s clear Google is attempting to capture the smaller ones that are seriously considering migrating to virtual machines and other cloud-powered services. Microsoft still makes the bulk of its money through licensing and business / enterprise software sales, and any enterprise-focused attack on its Windows client and server businesses is always intriguing, especially when it comes from Google.

More than 10 years ago Microsoft dominated browser market share with over 90 percent and it seemed unlikely that any company could change that. Years later, following some hefty antitrust fines and agreements in the US and Europe, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer share hovers around 20 percent, dependingon who you ask. Google’s Chrome browser now controls the majority when you factor in modern and common mobile usage, with around 30-40 percent, so it’s not inconceivable that the search giant might be able to disrupt Microsoft’s enterprise dominance too by positioning Chrome OS as a thin client for a cloud computing future. It’s a costly process for businesses to migrate away from Windows, so it certainly won’t be easy, but Google and others have a genuine opportunity to capture customers as companies look beyond Windows XP. With Google focused constantly on the cloud, it's no surprise why Microsoft's new CEO wants the company to be "cloud first."

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

Microsoft to bring Android apps to Windows


Of Microsoft’s many challenges in mobile, none loom larger than the app deficit: it only takes a popular new title like Flappy Bird to highlight what the company is missing out on. Windows 8 apps are also few and far between, and Microsoft is stuck in a position where it’s struggling to generate developer interest in its latest style of apps across phones and tablets. Some argue Microsoft should dump Windows Phone and create its own "forked" version of Android — not unlike what Amazon has done with its Kindle Fire tablets — while others claim that’s anunreasonably difficult task. With anew, mobile- and cloud-focused CEO in placeNokia's decision to build an Android phone, and rumors ofAndroid apps coming to Windows, could we finally see Microsoft experimenting with Google’s forbidden fruit?

Sources familiar with Microsoft’s plans tell The Verge that the company is seriously considering allowing Android apps to run on both Windows and Windows Phone. While planning is ongoing and it's still early, we’re told that some inside Microsoft favor the idea of simply enabling Android apps inside its Windows and Windows Phone Stores, while others believe it could lead to the death of the Windows platform altogether. The mixed (and strong) feelings internally highlight that Microsoft will need to be careful with any radical move.

Android is the mobile equivalent of Windows

Android is the mobile equivalent of Windows on desktop PCs — it’s everywhere. That growth shows no signs of stopping, and it represents a huge blockade for Microsoft’s mobile efforts across multiple market segments. iOS might still dominate developer interest for new apps, but Android has successfully bridged the gap on the smartphone side, something Windows Phone is still far from achieving. Android apps usually debut alongside their iOS equivalents, or shortly afterwards, and developers are clearly investing time and money on both platforms. For Microsoft, meanwhile, it’s a challenge of growing Windows Phone shipments and apps. Running Android apps on Windows Phone and Windows could serve as a Band-Aid.

Of course, this is a refrain we’ve heard before — the specter of BlackBerry’s failed effort to boost the relevance of its BlackBerry 10 platform by supporting Android apps looms large. Still, Microsoft is a different beast: it has the large backing of its enterprise, server, and cloud software sales to provide it with the cushion required to make radical moves. Nokia also ships considerably more smartphones than BlackBerry does. That doesn’t mean the prospects of running Android apps across Windows and Windows Phone are a guaranteed success story for Microsoft, but it may have the momentum to successfully co-opt Android that BlackBerry lacked.

While the latest rumors suggest that Nokia is significantly forking Android to push its own apps and Microsoft’s services to the masses with a low-cost handset, sources say that Microsoft’s plans could be far less involved. The company wants to enable Android apps on Windows and control the store that consumers download them from, but it’s unlikely that it will want to handle the complex job of supporting an additional platform. Instead, if such a plan goes ahead, it will likely involve a third-party "enabler."

Where might Microsoft go for assistance? Android on Windows is a muddled mess right now, but Intel and software firm BlueStacks might be good places to start. Intel is pushing its own Dual OS concept to let PC makers create hardware that runs both Android and Windows. Meanwhile, AMD has sided with BlueStacks — a company that Intel has even invested in itself — to allow users to run Android apps inside Windows with the help of an ARM processor embedded in some of its chips. BlueStacks has been enabling Android apps to run on Windows for a few years now, and it has signed deals with Lenovo and Asus to ship its software on their PCs.

It’s remains unknown whether Intel or BlueStacks are in active partnership discussions with Microsoft. A BlueStacks representative refused to provide comment to The Verge, but sources familiar with Intel's plans have indicated that the chipmaker has been pushing Microsoft to provide Android apps in its Windows Store.

Regardless of who is involved, any official method for running Android apps on Windows and Windows Phone would need to be extraordinarily simple for consumers to understand and use. While the reality of virtualizing Android apps on Windows is far from simple, if apps were packaged up in a painless install method within the Windows Store and approved by Microsoft, consumers would be more likely to get on board. Then again, BlackBerry hasn’t had much luck winning anyone over, and Amazon’s Appstore is filled with out-of-date apps ferried over from Google Play.

Android apps on Windows presents developer challenges

Such an approach would also raise questions over how developers could tweak and manage their applications for Microsoft’s implementation and process, and it could confuse and alienate native Windows developers even further. There’s also a risk of developers giving up on Microsoft’s "Metro" apps entirely, settling for the easier option of app porting over building something entirely new. Microsoft would have to weigh up the technical aspects, partner considerations, and the effect on business models before any decision is made either way.

Why would Microsoft want to do any of this? The answer is simple: "embrace, extend, and extinguish." It’s a phrase Microsoft used internallyto describe its own strategy for disrupting standards and competitors in the 1990s. While Microsoft has been trying every trick to convince developers to build for Windows Phone and Windows, it has to answer the mobile reality the company faces. Embracing Android and extending it to the Windows and Windows Phone app stores could help Microsoft temporarily in the app race, but it might also stem the flow of consumers choosing Android- and iOS-based smartphones and tablets.

Consumers sign in to Android devices with their Google accounts, and in to iOS with their iCloud accounts. By comparison, relatively few are using Windows 8 machines or Windows Phones to sign in to Microsoft’s own cloud services. Microsoft is making moves with OneDrive and other apps across Windows, iOS, and Android, but the overall app shortage on Windows and Windows Phone is the larger concern. If Android apps or even Office, OneDrive, and other services on rival operating systems help pull people over to Microsoft’s devices and platforms, then it might not matter if consumers are opting to use Android or "Metro" apps on Windows or Windows Phone, as long as they’re using a Microsoft account to sign in to their device and utilizing Microsoft’s services. Nokia’s upcoming "Normandy" Android handset will also push consumers towards Microsoft’s services, alongside having the benefits of being a low-cost handset running some popular Android apps.

Microsoft now has to decide on a big mobile bet

For Microsoft, the idea of Android apps running on Windows is as much about preventing more consumers moving to Android as it is building up consumer use of its cloud services. If Microsoft can convince more consumers to purchase its own Windows-powered devices because they now have access to key Android apps, then that might just help its own tablet and smartphone prospects. While any realistic implementation of Android apps on Windows will not likely be ready untilMicrosoft’s Windows 9 work is ready in 2015 at the earliest, if at all, Microsoft faces an ongoing battle over the cloud and the long, slow decline of the PC in consumer markets. The software giant is alsoconsidering free versions of Windows Phone and Windows RT to entice OEMs to produce devices, but embracing Android and enabling it could be the next step. Microsoft is never going to "extinguish" Android, but its long-term success requires that consumers look at its hardware and services seriously. Windows 8 was enough of a big risk on the PC side, but Microsoft now has to decide whether it wants to make an equally big — and unorthodox — bet on mobile.

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Microsoft's new CEO is Satya Nadella

 After months if beating around the bush, the search for Microsoft's new CEO is over, the software giant has indeed appointed Satya Nadella as its new CEO to replace Steve Ballmer. The 46-year-old Nadella will take over immediately, allowing Ballmer to retire early. .

"Today is a very humbling day for me" says Nadella. "It is an incredible honor for me to lead and serve this great company of ours." In the broad letter, Nadella outlines his reasons for working at Microsoft, along with his 22-year history at the company. "While we have seen great success, we are hungry to do more," he notes. "This is a critical time for the industry and for Microsoft. Make no mistake, we are headed for greater places — as technology evolves and we evolve with and ahead of it. Our job is to ensure that Microsoft thrives in a mobile and cloud-first world."

As Nadella takes over as CEO , Co-founder Bipl Gates stepped down as chairman. his new official title is founder and technology advisor. "I'm thrilled that Satya has asked me to step up, substantially increasing my time at the company," says Gates in a video commenting on Nadella's new position. "I'll have over a third of my time available to meet with product groups and it'll be fun to define this next round of products working together."In a similar video, former CEO Steve Ballmer also congratulates Nadella on his new role: "I have absolutely no doubt Microsoft is in good hands, with Satya and the rest of the senior leadership team that is in place," says Ballmer. "We have so many strong leaders … the future of Microsoft is incredibly bright." It's clear that Microsoft's former CEOs back Nadella, and he also has the unanimous support of the board.Nadella is a Microsoft veteran, having joined the company over 20 years ago. Born in India in 1967, Nadella studied Electrical Engineering at the Mangalore University before moving to the US to study computer science at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He originally worked at Microsoft rival Sun Microsystems before heading to Redmond to work on research for Microsoft’s online services division. He has held a number of roles inside the company: he's worked in the company’s business division on Office and even has some experience building the Bing search engine. Most importantly, however, he has been instrumental in transforming Microsoft’s cloud business and has previously led its server and tools business.

Microsoft's server and enterprise guy

Nadella’s work on Microsoft’s server and tools business helped boost the division’s profitability and smoothed its transition from traditional client-server computing to cloud infrastructure like Windows Azure. Recently, Nadella has been focused on Microsoft’s cloud businesses, pushing the company’s underlying infrastructure and services into products like Bing, SkyDrive, Xbox Live, and Skype. While Nadella has little experience running consumer-facing businesses like Xbox or Skype, he does have a deep understanding and knowledge of the computing and engineering required to develop and build services and applications that are used by millions. Given Microsoft’s "devices and services" push, he’s clearly well positioned to help steer the company in one particular direction.

While Nadella has made a name for himself inside Microsoft as an intelligent and charismatic leader over the years, he’s not a household name to consumers, and even to most businesses. He has surged through the ranks with technical expertise and a focus on enterprise, but has little involvement in Microsoft’s devices and mobile future. His appointment will come as a surprise to those who expected former Nokia CEO Stephen Elop to take over from Ballmer. While Elop has run a publicly traded company, Nadella lacks this key experience. Elop will still rejoin Microsoft shortly to lead an expanded devices team focused on Surface, Windows Phones, and Xbox.

Consumer focus yet to be proven

Microsoft’s core strength currently relies on enterprises and businesses purchasing licenses or using software and services that the company develops. While Windows is struggling thanks to a decline in PC shipments, Microsoft’s enterprise, Office software, and services are continuing to bring in impressive revenues for the company. Nadella compliments this strength perfectly, but he will now need to prove he can complete Microsoft’s vision for devices and its ongoing mobile push.

So what do you think? Will Nadella be a great CEO for Microsoft? Tell us in the comments section below.

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contact our Support

Email us: Preet@iTechnoBlog.com

Our Team Memebers